Session:   
Updated:   2026-02-04

Home - Bills - Bill - Authors - Dates - Locations - Analyses - Organizations

Measure
Authors Padilla  
Subject California Technology Innovation and Ratepayer Protection Act.
Relating To relating to electricity.
Title An act to add Chapter 14 (commencing with Section 8540) to Division 4.1 of the Public Utilities Code, relating to electricity.
Last Action Dt 2026-01-13
State Introduced
Status Pending Referral
Flags
Vote Req Approp Fiscal Cmte Local Prog Subs Chgs Urgency Tax Levy Active?
Majority No Yes Yes None No No Y
i
Leginfo Link  
Bill Actions
2026-01-14     From printer. May be acted upon on or after February 13.
2026-01-13     Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Versions
Introduced     2026-01-13
Analyses TBD
Latest Text Bill Full Text
Latest Text Digest

Existing law vests the Public Utilities Commission with regulatory authority over public utilities, including electrical corporations, while local publicly owned electric utilities are under the direction of their governing boards. Existing law authorizes the commission to fix the rates and charges for every public utility and requires that those rates and charges be just and reasonable.

This bill, the California Technology Innovation and Ratepayer Protection Act, would require the commission, on or before July 1, 2027, to establish or modify an electrical corporation tariff for the interconnection of the participating customer facilities and the transmission, distribution, and generation services to participating customers, as specified. The bill would require the commission, as part of establishing or modifying the electrical corporation tariff, to, at a minimum, establish eligibility criteria for large load customers, as defined, and facilities, evaluate the risks and benefits of this tariff to nonparticipating ratepayers, and ensure that the tariff prevents the creation of stranded costs for, or cost shifts, to nonparticipating ratepayers. The bill would require the tariff to require a large load customer that submits an application for interconnection of a facility to an electrical corporation to disclose whether an application for the same facility has been submitted in other electrical corporation service territories or other jurisdictions and to disclose each instance in which an application for the same facility has been submitted. The bill would also require the tariff to, among other things, assign cost responsibility for all transmission facility upgrades triggered by a facility interconnection to the applicable participating customer and to require an early termination fee to be assessed against any participating customer under specified circumstances. The bill would also require each participating customer to install onsite zero-carbon energy storage, as provided, and each electrical corporation to publish and update maps showing locations where large load customers can interconnect without the need for significant, costly, and time-consuming transmission upgrades.

This bill would encourage each local publicly owned electric utility to develop a tariff that is similar to the electrical corporation tariff described above and ensures that costs are not shifted from a customer that is subject to the local publicly owned electric utility’s tariff to a customer that is not subject to that tariff, and that the costs of investments in infrastructure made by a large load customer that is subject to the tariff are not recoverable from other nonparticipating ratepayers.

Under existing law, a violation of any order, decision, rule, direction, demand, or requirement of the commission is a crime.