Session:   
Updated:   2026-04-07

Home - Bills - Bill - Authors - Dates - Locations - Analyses - Organizations

Measure
Authors Reyes   Umberg  
Coauthors: Durazo   Gonzalez  
Subject Courthouses: privilege from civil arrest.
Relating To relating to courts.
Title An act to add Section 43.541 to, and to repeal and add Section 43.54 of, the Civil Code, relating to courts.
Last Action Dt 2026-03-25
State Amended Senate
Status In Committee Process
Flags
Vote Req Approp Fiscal Cmte Local Prog Subs Chgs Urgency Tax Levy Active?
Majority No Yes No None No No Y
i
Leginfo Link  
Bill Actions
2026-03-25     From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
2026-02-11     Referred to Com. on RLS.
2026-01-07     From printer. May be acted upon on or after February 6.
2026-01-06     Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Versions
Amended Senate     2026-03-25
Introduced     2026-01-06
Analyses TBD
Latest Text Bill Full Text
Latest Text Digest

Existing law prohibits a person from being subject to civil arrest in a courthouse while attending a court proceeding or having legal business in a courthouse, except pursuant to a valid judicial warrant. Existing law confers specified powers to judicial officers, including to preserve and enforce order in the officer’s immediate presence and in proceedings before the officer, to compel obedience to the officer’s lawful orders, and to prohibit activities that threaten access to courthouses and court proceedings, including protecting the privilege from civil arrest at courthouses and court proceedings.

This bill would prohibit a person from being subject to civil arrest while traveling to, while present at, or while traveling from a courthouse for any lawful activity, as defined. The bill would authorize a court to issue appropriate judicial orders to protect the privilege from civil arrest. The bill would authorize the Attorney General to bring a civil action to obtain appropriate equitable and declaratory relief if the Attorney General has reasonable cause to believe that a violation of these provisions has occurred or is imminent. The bill would also authorize a person who has been subject to civil arrest to bring a civil action for appropriate equitable and declaratory relief and civil damages, including actual damages and statutory damages of $10,000. The bill would authorize the person in a successful action to recover court costs and reasonable attorney’s fees.

This bill would require the Judicial Council to promulgate rules necessary to ensure specified requirements, including, among other things, that any representative of a local, state, or federal law enforcement agency who, while acting in an official capacity, enters a courthouse intending to arrest an individual identify themselves to uniformed court personnel, state their specific law enforcement purpose and the intended enforcement action to be taken, and provide court personnel with a copy of a valid judicial warrant concerning the intended enforcement action to be taken. The bill would require courts to maintain data regarding activities undertaken by law enforcement personnel at courthouses and provide that data to the Judicial Council. The bill would require the Judicial Council to annually prepare a report compiling statistics related to law enforcement agencies engaging in law enforcement activity of any kind at courthouses, as specified, and to post the report on its public internet website and on the California Courts Judicial Branch of California internet website.

This bill would also make related findings and declarations and specify that the provisions of this act are severable.