Session:   
Updated:   2026-02-04

Home - Bills - Bill - Authors - Dates - Locations - Analyses - Organizations

Measure
Authors Wiener   Wahab  
Principle Coauthors: Mark González  
Coauthors: Becker   Caballero   Cortese   Durazo   Gonzalez   McNerney   Pérez   Rubio   Ahrens   Ávila Farías   Bryan   Connolly   Elhawary   Garcia   Haney   Jackson   Ortega   Quirk-Silva   Rogers  
Subject Civil rights: deprivation of federal constitutional rights, privileges, and immunities.
Relating To relating to civil rights.
Title An act to add Section 53.8 to the Civil Code, relating to civil rights.
Last Action Dt 2026-01-22
State Amended Senate
Status Pending Referral
Flags
Vote Req Approp Fiscal Cmte Local Prog Subs Chgs Urgency Tax Levy Active?
Majority No No No None No No Y
i
Leginfo Link  
Bill Actions
2026-01-27     In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
2026-01-27     Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 30. Noes 10.) Ordered to the Assembly.
2026-01-26     Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
2026-01-22     Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
2026-01-22     From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (January 22).
2026-01-21     Set for hearing January 22.
2026-01-20     January 20 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
2026-01-15     Set for hearing January 20.
2026-01-14     From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 2.) (January 13). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
2026-01-06     Set for hearing January 13.
2026-01-05     Re-referred to Coms. on JUD. and APPR.
2026-01-05     From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
2025-09-13     Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
2025-09-12     Joint Rule 61(a)(13) suspended. (Ayes 28. Noes 8. Page 2999.)
2025-09-12     Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
2025-09-12     Ordered to second reading.
2025-09-12     From inactive file.
2025-06-05     Ordered to inactive file on request of Senator Wiener.
2025-05-23     Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
2025-05-23     From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 1. Page 1211.) (May 23).
2025-05-20     Set for hearing May 23.
2025-05-19     May 19 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
2025-05-09     Set for hearing May 19.
2025-05-01     Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
2025-04-30     From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 2. Page 943.) (April 29).
2025-04-23     Set for hearing April 29.
2025-04-23     From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 4. Noes 0. Page 870.) (April 23). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
2025-04-04     Set for hearing April 23.
2025-04-02     Re-referred to Coms. on L., P.E. & R. and JUD.
2025-03-24     From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
2025-03-12     Referred to Com. on RLS.
2025-02-24     Read first time.
2025-02-24     From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 24.
2025-02-21     Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Versions
Amended Senate     2026-01-22
Amended Senate     2026-01-05
Amended Senate     2025-09-12
Amended Senate     2025-05-01
Amended Senate     2025-03-24
Introduced     2025-02-21
Analyses TBD
Latest Text Bill Full Text
Latest Text Digest

Under existing law, the Tom Bane Civil Rights Act (act), if a person or persons, whether or not acting under color of law, interferes or attempts to interfere, by threats, intimidation, or coercion, with the exercise or enjoyment by any individual or individuals of rights secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or of the rights secured by the Constitution or laws of this state, the Attorney General, or any district attorney or city attorney, is authorized to bring a civil action for injunctive and other appropriate equitable relief in the name of the people of the State of California, in order to protect the exercise or enjoyment of the right or rights secured.

Under that act, an individual may also institute and prosecute in their own name and on their own behalf a civil action for damages, as described, for any resulting interference or attempt at interference of the individual’s exercise or enjoyment of rights secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States or this state. That act requires the aforementioned actions to be filed in either the superior court for the county in which the conduct complained of occurred or in the superior court for the county in which a person whose conduct complained of resides or has their place of business (venue requirement). The act authorizes the court to award the petitioner or plaintiff reasonable attorney’s fees in addition to any damages, injunction, or other equitable relief awarded in these civil actions (attorney’s fees authorization).

Existing federal law provides that every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any state, territory, or the District of Columbia, subjects or causes to be subjected any United States citizen or other person within the jurisdiction to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, is liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except as provided.

This bill would also provide that every person who, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, as defined, subjects or causes to be subjected any citizen of this state or any person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the United States Constitution, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except as specified. The bill would apply the aforementioned venue requirement and attorney’s fees authorization, except as specified, to any action brought under these provisions. The bill would authorize a court, in its discretion, to also award costs, except as specified, and expert fees to the prevailing plaintiff in any action brought under these provisions.

This bill would authorize a defendant in an action brought under these provisions to assert a defense of absolute or qualified immunity to the same extent as a person sued under certain federal provisions under like circumstances, as specified, and would specify that nothing in these provisions is to be construed to waive or abrogate any defense of sovereign immunity otherwise available to a party, as specified. The bill would prohibit any civil action brought under these provisions from being commenced later than 2 years after the date that the cause of action accrues. The bill would make its provisions severable. The bill would specify that these provisions apply retroactively to March 1, 2025, as provided.