Session:   
Updated:   2026-02-04

Home - Bills - Bill - Authors - Dates - Locations - Analyses - Organizations

Measure
Authors Grove  
Subject California Environmental Quality Act: expired regional habitat conservation plan: exemption.
Relating To relating to environmental quality.
Title An act to add Section 21080.54 to the Public Resources Code, relating to environmental quality.
Last Action Dt 2025-03-25
State Amended Senate
Status Died
Flags
Vote Req Approp Fiscal Cmte Local Prog Subs Chgs Urgency Tax Levy Active?
Majority No Yes Yes None No No Y
i
Leginfo Link  
Bill Actions
2026-02-02     Returned to Secretary of Senate pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
2025-04-16     April 23 set for first hearing canceled at the request of author.
2025-04-04     Set for hearing April 23.
2025-04-02     Re-referred to Coms. on E.Q. and N.R. & W.
2025-03-25     From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
2025-02-26     Referred to Com. on RLS.
2025-02-19     From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 21.
2025-02-18     Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Versions
Amended Senate     2025-03-25
Introduced     2025-02-18
Analyses TBD
Latest Text Bill Full Text
Latest Text Digest

The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of an environmental impact report on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment.

This bill would exempt from the requirements of CEQA a project developed solely to serve an urgent public health or housing need, as specified, that is within the boundaries of an expired regional habitat conservation plan, and that had an environmental review completed consistent with the requirements of the regional habitat conservation plan as the plan existed before the plan’s expiration. Because the bill would require a lead agency to determine the applicability of this exemption, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.