Session:   

Bill

Home - Bills - Bill - Authors - Dates - Keywords - Tags - Locations

Measure SB 277
Authors Weber Pierson  
Subject Criminal procedure: search of persons.
Relating To relating to criminal procedure.
Title An act to add Section 833.6 to the Penal Code, relating to criminal procedure.
Last Action Dt 2025-03-26
State Amended Senate
Status In Committee Process
Active? Y
Vote Required Majority
Appropriation No
Fiscal Committee Yes
Local Program Yes
Substantive Changes None
Urgency No
Tax Levy No
Leginfo Link Bill
Actions
2025-05-23     May 23 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
2025-05-16     Set for hearing May 23.
2025-04-21     April 21 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
2025-04-10     Set for hearing April 21.
2025-04-08     From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 1. Page 708.) (April 8). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
2025-03-27     Set for hearing April 8.
2025-03-26     From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
2025-03-18     Set for hearing April 1.
2025-03-18     April 1 set for first hearing canceled at the request of author.
2025-02-14     Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
2025-02-05     From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 7.
2025-02-04     Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Keywords
Tags
Versions
Amended Senate     2025-03-26
Introduced     2025-02-04
Last Version Text
<?xml version="1.0" ?>
<ns0:MeasureDoc xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ns0="http://lc.ca.gov/legalservices/schemas/caml.1#" xmlns:ns3="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" version="1.0" xsi:schemaLocation="http://lc.ca.gov/legalservices/schemas/caml.1# xca.1.xsd">
	


	<ns0:Description>
		<ns0:Id>20250SB__027798AMD</ns0:Id>
		<ns0:VersionNum>98</ns0:VersionNum>
		<ns0:History>
			<ns0:Action>
				<ns0:ActionText>INTRODUCED</ns0:ActionText>
				<ns0:ActionDate>2025-02-04</ns0:ActionDate>
			</ns0:Action>
			<ns0:Action>
				<ns0:ActionText>AMENDED_SENATE</ns0:ActionText>
				<ns0:ActionDate>2025-03-26</ns0:ActionDate>
			</ns0:Action>
		</ns0:History>
		<ns0:LegislativeInfo>
			<ns0:SessionYear>2025</ns0:SessionYear>
			<ns0:SessionNum>0</ns0:SessionNum>
			<ns0:MeasureType>SB</ns0:MeasureType>
			<ns0:MeasureNum>277</ns0:MeasureNum>
			<ns0:MeasureState>AMD</ns0:MeasureState>
		</ns0:LegislativeInfo>
		<ns0:AuthorText authorType="LEAD_AUTHOR">Introduced by Senator Weber Pierson</ns0:AuthorText>
		<ns0:Authors>
			<ns0:Legislator>
				<ns0:Contribution>LEAD_AUTHOR</ns0:Contribution>
				<ns0:House>SENATE</ns0:House>
				<ns0:Name>Weber Pierson</ns0:Name>
			</ns0:Legislator>
		</ns0:Authors>
		<ns0:Title>An act to add Section 833.6 to the Penal Code, relating to criminal procedure. </ns0:Title>
		<ns0:RelatingClause>criminal procedure</ns0:RelatingClause>
		<ns0:GeneralSubject>
			<ns0:Subject>Criminal procedure: search of persons.</ns0:Subject>
		</ns0:GeneralSubject>
		<ns0:DigestText>
			<html:p>Existing provisions of the United States and California Constitutions ensure the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against warrantless seizures and searches. Case law establishes exceptions to this right, including allowing a peace officer to conduct a limited search of a person for firearms or weapons if the peace officer reasonably concludes that the person detained may be armed and presently dangerous to the peace officer or others, or if the person consents to a search.</html:p>
			<html:p>This bill would authorize a peace officer to request consent to search an individual, their property, or their effects only if the officer is investigating a crime and has reasonable suspicion that the individual to be searched has an item in their possession that is evidence of criminal activity. The bill would require the officer to follow a specified procedure in a specified order, including advising the individual that their consent is voluntary, explaining to the individual the scope of the search, and recording the individual’s consent. The bill would prohibit an officer from exceeding the scope of the
			 search explained to the individual and would require the officer to discontinue the search if the individual withdraws their consent. The bill would authorize searches based on unsolicited consent if the officer follows specified procedures. The bill would require an officer to record the required actions they performed before and during a consensual search consistent with the policies of their employing agency.</html:p>
			<html:p>Because the bill would impose requirements on local law enforcement, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.</html:p>
			<html:p>The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.</html:p>
			<html:p>This bill would
			 provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.</html:p>
		</ns0:DigestText>
		<ns0:DigestKey>
			<ns0:VoteRequired>MAJORITY</ns0:VoteRequired>
			<ns0:Appropriation>NO</ns0:Appropriation>
			<ns0:FiscalCommittee>YES</ns0:FiscalCommittee>
			<ns0:LocalProgram>YES</ns0:LocalProgram>
		</ns0:DigestKey>
		<ns0:MeasureIndicators>
			<ns0:ImmediateEffect>NO</ns0:ImmediateEffect>
			<ns0:ImmediateEffectFlags>
				<ns0:Urgency>NO</ns0:Urgency>
				<ns0:TaxLevy>NO</ns0:TaxLevy>
				<ns0:Election>NO</ns0:Election>
				<ns0:UsualCurrentExpenses>NO</ns0:UsualCurrentExpenses>
				<ns0:BudgetBill>NO</ns0:BudgetBill>
				<ns0:Prop25TrailerBill>NO</ns0:Prop25TrailerBill>
			</ns0:ImmediateEffectFlags>
		</ns0:MeasureIndicators>
	</ns0:Description>
	<ns0:Bill id="bill">
		<ns0:Preamble>The people of the State of California do enact as follows:</ns0:Preamble>
		<ns0:BillSection id="id_A7082A2D-F64D-429C-8C4A-B81EE8775034">
			<ns0:Num>SECTION 1.</ns0:Num>
			<ns0:ActionLine action="IS_ADDED" ns3:href="urn:caml:codes:PEN:caml#xpointer(%2Fcaml%3ALawDoc%2Fcaml%3ACode%2F%2Fcaml%3ALawSection%5Bcaml%3ANum%3D'833.6'%5D)" ns3:label="fractionType: LAW_SECTION" ns3:type="locator">
				Section 833.6 is added to the 
				<ns0:DocName>Penal Code</ns0:DocName>
				, to read:
			</ns0:ActionLine>
			<ns0:Fragment>
				<ns0:LawSection id="id_E7A303B6-4CDA-48C4-A727-6A8A3E2B5FB0">
					<ns0:Num>833.6.</ns0:Num>
					<ns0:LawSectionVersion id="id_DEF8F92E-47E5-4EF5-88E3-D56C1D36DDFD">
						<ns0:Content>
							<html:p>
								(a)
								<html:span class="EnSpace"/>
								A peace officer may request consent to search an individual, their property, or their effects only if the officer is investigating a crime and has reasonable suspicion that the
						individual
						has an item in their possession that is evidence of criminal activity.
							</html:p>
							<html:p>
								(b)
								<html:span class="EnSpace"/>
								(1)
								<html:span class="EnSpace"/>
								An officer requesting consent to
						conduct a search pursuant to subdivision (a) shall, before conducting the search, do all of the following in the following order:
							</html:p>
							<html:p>
								(A)
								<html:span class="EnSpace"/>
								Advise the individual that their consent is voluntary.
							</html:p>
							<html:p>
								(B)
								<html:span class="EnSpace"/>
								Explain to the individual the scope of the search.
							</html:p>
							<html:p>
								(C)
								<html:span class="EnSpace"/>
								Receive and record the individual’s consent consistent with the requirements of state law.
							</html:p>
							<html:p>
								(2)
								<html:span class="EnSpace"/>
								An officer shall record the actions they performed pursuant to paragraph (1) consistent with the policies of their employing agency.
							</html:p>
							<html:p>
								(c)
								<html:span class="EnSpace"/>
								An officer conducting a search pursuant to subdivision (b) shall do both of the following:
							</html:p>
							<html:p>
								(1)
								<html:span class="EnSpace"/>
								Not exceed the scope of the search described in subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1) of subdivision (b).
							</html:p>
							<html:p>
								(2)
								<html:span class="EnSpace"/>
								Discontinue the search if the individual withdraws their consent.
							</html:p>
							<html:p>
								(d)
								<html:span class="EnSpace"/>
								(1)
								<html:span class="EnSpace"/>
								This section does not prevent an officer from conducting a search based on an individual’s unsolicited consent provided that the officer does all of the following:
							</html:p>
							<html:p>
								(A)
								<html:span class="EnSpace"/>
								Advises the individual that their consent is voluntary.
							</html:p>
							<html:p>
								(B)
								<html:span class="EnSpace"/>
								Confirms with the individual the scope of the search.
							</html:p>
							<html:p>
								(C)
								<html:span class="EnSpace"/>
								Records the
						unsolicited consent by the individual.
							</html:p>
							<html:p>
								(D)
								<html:span class="EnSpace"/>
								Does not exceed the scope of the search described in subparagraph (B).
							</html:p>
							<html:p>
								(E)
								<html:span class="EnSpace"/>
								Discontinues the search if the individual withdraws their consent.
							</html:p>
							<html:p>
								(2)
								<html:span class="EnSpace"/>
								An officer shall record the actions they performed pursuant to paragraph (1) consistent with the policies of their employing agency.
							</html:p>
							<html:p>
								(e)
								<html:span class="EnSpace"/>
								An officer may request consent to conduct a search pursuant to this section only if doing so does not violate any applicable state law, local ordinance, or agency policy.
							</html:p>
							<html:p>
								(f)
								<html:span class="EnSpace"/>
								This section does not prohibit a local jurisdiction from adopting requirements that are more protective of individuals
						than those described in this section.
							</html:p>
						</ns0:Content>
					</ns0:LawSectionVersion>
				</ns0:LawSection>
			</ns0:Fragment>
		</ns0:BillSection>
		<ns0:BillSection id="id_7800BE1E-77F6-4A93-9558-A15B6A3102A9">
			<ns0:Num>SEC. 2.</ns0:Num>
			<ns0:Content>
				<html:p>If the Commission on State Mandates determines that this act contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement to local agencies and school districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Part 7 (commencing with Section 17500) of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code.</html:p>
			</ns0:Content>
		</ns0:BillSection>
	</ns0:Bill>
</ns0:MeasureDoc>
Last Version Text Digest Existing provisions of the United States and California Constitutions ensure the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against warrantless seizures and searches. Case law establishes exceptions to this right, including allowing a peace officer to conduct a limited search of a person for firearms or weapons if the peace officer reasonably concludes that the person detained may be armed and presently dangerous to the peace officer or others, or if the person consents to a search. This bill would authorize a peace officer to request consent to search an individual, their property, or their effects only if the officer is investigating a crime and has reasonable suspicion that the individual to be searched has an item in their possession that is evidence of criminal activity. The bill would require the officer to follow a specified procedure in a specified order, including advising the individual that their consent is voluntary, explaining to the individual the scope of the search, and recording the individual’s consent. The bill would prohibit an officer from exceeding the scope of the search explained to the individual and would require the officer to discontinue the search if the individual withdraws their consent. The bill would authorize searches based on unsolicited consent if the officer follows specified procedures. The bill would require an officer to record the required actions they performed before and during a consensual search consistent with the policies of their employing agency.