Session:   
Updated:   2026-04-09

Home - Bills - Bill - Authors - Dates - Locations - Analyses - Organizations

Measure
Authors Weber Pierson  
Subject Health care coverage: rate review.
Relating To relating to health care coverage.
Title An act to amend Sections 1385.01 and 1385.035 of the Health and Safety Code, and to amend Sections 10181 and 10181.35 of the Insurance Code, relating to health care coverage.
Last Action Dt 2026-04-07
State Amended Senate
Status In Committee Process
Flags
Vote Req Approp Fiscal Cmte Local Prog Subs Chgs Urgency Tax Levy Active?
Majority No Yes Yes None No No Y
i
Leginfo Link  
Bill Actions
2026-04-07     From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
2026-04-02     Set for hearing April 15.
2026-04-01     April 8 set for first hearing canceled at the request of author.
2026-03-23     Set for hearing April 8.
2026-02-18     Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
2026-02-12     From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 14.
2026-02-11     Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Versions
Amended Senate     2026-04-07
Introduced     2026-02-11
Analyses TBD
Latest Text Bill Full Text
Latest Text Digest

Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care and makes a violation of the act by a health care service plan a misdemeanor. Existing law provides for the regulation of health insurers by the Department of Insurance. Existing law defines “unreasonable rate increase,” for these purposes, to have the same meaning as in the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, which is that an unreasonable rate increase exists when the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services makes a determination that a rate increase is excessive, unjustified, or unfairly discriminatory, among other things.

This bill would instead define “unreasonable rate increase,” for the above-described purposes, to mean a rate increase that the Director of the Department of Managed Health Care or the Insurance Commissioner, as applicable, determines is excessive, unjustified, unfairly discriminatory, or otherwise unreasonable.

Existing law requires a health care service plan or health insurer to submit rates to their regulating entity for review and to demonstrate the impact of any changes in the rate of growth of health care costs resulting from health care cost targets.

Existing law requires the director or the commissioner, as applicable, in determining whether a rate is unreasonable or not justified for purposes of the above-described review, to consider the impact on changes in health care costs as a result of the health care cost targets described above.

This bill would require the director or the commissioner, as applicable, to additionally consider any excessive tangible net equity of the plan or the insurer in the above-described determination. The bill would require the Department of Managed Health Care and the Department of Insurance, in collaboration with the Office of Health Care Affordability, to each conduct an enhanced rate review to determine if health care premiums are affordable for individual and group purchasers. The bill would require the review to include the annual change in premiums and cost sharing for the prior 5 years, including deductibles, copayments, coinsurance, and any other cost sharing that impact actuarial value.