| Bill Actions |
| 2025-07-01 |
|
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author. |
| 2025-06-18 |
|
Referred to Coms. on AGRI. and JUD. |
| 2025-06-05 |
|
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. |
| 2025-06-04 |
|
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 46. Noes 15. Page 2083.) |
| 2025-06-02 |
|
Read third time and amended. Ordered to third reading. (Page 1952.) |
| 2025-05-27 |
|
Read second time. Ordered to third reading. |
| 2025-05-23 |
|
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 2.) (May 23). |
| 2025-04-30 |
|
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to suspense file. |
| 2025-04-10 |
|
Re-referred to Com. on APPR. |
| 2025-04-09 |
|
Read second time and amended. |
| 2025-04-08 |
|
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 1.) (April 8). |
| 2025-03-27 |
|
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (March 26). Re-referred to Com. on JUD. |
| 2025-03-19 |
|
Re-referred to Com. on AGRI. |
| 2025-03-18 |
|
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on AGRI. Read second time and amended. |
| 2025-03-10 |
|
Referred to Coms. on AGRI. and JUD. |
| 2025-02-20 |
|
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22. |
| 2025-02-19 |
|
Read first time. To print. |
|
| Latest Text Digest |
Existing law prohibits a person from causing, permitting, or aiding or abetting the fighting, worrying, or injuring of a cock. Existing law provides that a violation of this provision is a misdemeanor, as provided. Existing law generally regulates the production of poultry, eggs, and egg products.
This bill would prohibit, on and after January 1, 2027, a person from keeping more than 25 roosters that are movement constrained through the use of an enclosure or tether, except as specified. The bill would subject a person who violates this prohibition to a civil penalty not to exceed $2,500 for each violation, as provided, and would provide that each day a rooster is kept in violation of that prohibition constitutes a distinct violation. The bill would define, among other terms, “rooster” and “enclosure” for purposes of these provisions.
|