Session:   

Bill

Home - Bills - Bill - Authors - Dates - Keywords - Tags - Locations

Measure AB 510
Authors Addis  
Subject Health care coverage: utilization review: peer-to-peer review.
Relating To relating to health care coverage.
Title An act to add Section 1367.017 to the Health and Safety Code, and to add Section 10123.138 to the Insurance Code, relating to health care coverage.
Last Action Dt 2025-04-28
State Amended Assembly
Status In Committee Process
Active? Y
Vote Required Majority
Appropriation No
Fiscal Committee Yes
Local Program Yes
Substantive Changes None
Urgency No
Tax Levy No
Leginfo Link Bill
Actions
2025-05-23     In committee: Held under submission.
2025-05-07     In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
2025-04-29     Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
2025-04-28     Read second time and amended.
2025-04-24     From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (April 22).
2025-04-21     Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
2025-04-10     From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. Read second time and amended.
2025-02-24     Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
2025-02-11     From printer. May be heard in committee March 13.
2025-02-10     Read first time. To print.
Keywords
Tags
Versions
Amended Assembly     2025-04-28
Amended Assembly     2025-04-10
Introduced     2025-02-10
Last Version Text
<?xml version="1.0" ?>
<ns0:MeasureDoc xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ns0="http://lc.ca.gov/legalservices/schemas/caml.1#" xmlns:ns3="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" version="1.0" xsi:schemaLocation="http://lc.ca.gov/legalservices/schemas/caml.1# xca.1.xsd">
	


	<ns0:Description>
		<ns0:Id>20250AB__051097AMD</ns0:Id>
		<ns0:VersionNum>97</ns0:VersionNum>
		<ns0:History>
			<ns0:Action>
				<ns0:ActionText>INTRODUCED</ns0:ActionText>
				<ns0:ActionDate>2025-02-10</ns0:ActionDate>
			</ns0:Action>
			<ns0:Action>
				<ns0:ActionText>AMENDED_ASSEMBLY</ns0:ActionText>
				<ns0:ActionDate>2025-04-10</ns0:ActionDate>
			</ns0:Action>
			<ns0:Action>
				<ns0:ActionText>AMENDED_ASSEMBLY</ns0:ActionText>
				<ns0:ActionDate>2025-04-28</ns0:ActionDate>
			</ns0:Action>
		</ns0:History>
		<ns0:LegislativeInfo>
			<ns0:SessionYear>2025</ns0:SessionYear>
			<ns0:SessionNum>0</ns0:SessionNum>
			<ns0:MeasureType>AB</ns0:MeasureType>
			<ns0:MeasureNum>510</ns0:MeasureNum>
			<ns0:MeasureState>AMD</ns0:MeasureState>
		</ns0:LegislativeInfo>
		<ns0:AuthorText authorType="LEAD_AUTHOR">Introduced by Assembly Member Addis</ns0:AuthorText>
		<ns0:Authors>
			<ns0:Legislator>
				<ns0:Contribution>LEAD_AUTHOR</ns0:Contribution>
				<ns0:House>ASSEMBLY</ns0:House>
				<ns0:Name>Addis</ns0:Name>
			</ns0:Legislator>
		</ns0:Authors>
		<ns0:Title> An act to add Section 1367.017 to the Health and Safety Code, and to add Section 10123.138 to the Insurance Code, relating to health care coverage. </ns0:Title>
		<ns0:RelatingClause>health care coverage</ns0:RelatingClause>
		<ns0:GeneralSubject>
			<ns0:Subject>Health care coverage: utilization review: peer-to-peer review.</ns0:Subject>
		</ns0:GeneralSubject>
		<ns0:DigestText>
			<html:p>Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care, and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law provides for the regulation of disability insurers by the Department of Insurance. Existing law generally authorizes a health care service plan or disability insurer to use prior authorization and other utilization review or utilization management functions, under which a licensed physician or a licensed health care professional who is competent to evaluate specific clinical issues may approve, modify, delay, or deny requests for health care services based on medical necessity.</html:p>
			<html:p>This bill, upon communication of a decision by a health care service plan or health insurer delaying, denying, or modifying a health care service based in whole or in part on medical necessity,
			 would authorize a provider to request review of the decision by a licensed physician, or a licensed health care professional under specified circumstances, who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and is of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider. The bill would authorize a licensed health care professional to be the reviewer if the provider requesting peer-to-peer review is not a physician. The bill, notwithstanding
			 any other law, would require these reviews to occur within 2 business days, or if an enrollee or insured faces an imminent and serious threat to their health, within a timely fashion appropriate for the nature of the enrollee’s or insured’s condition, as specified. If a health care service plan or health insurer fails to meet those timelines, the bill would deem the request for the health care service as approved and supersede any prior delay, denial, or modification.</html:p>
			<html:p>Because a violation of these provisions by a health care service plan would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. </html:p>
			<html:p>The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated
			 by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.</html:p>
			<html:p>This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.</html:p>
		</ns0:DigestText>
		<ns0:DigestKey>
			<ns0:VoteRequired>MAJORITY</ns0:VoteRequired>
			<ns0:Appropriation>NO</ns0:Appropriation>
			<ns0:FiscalCommittee>YES</ns0:FiscalCommittee>
			<ns0:LocalProgram>YES</ns0:LocalProgram>
		</ns0:DigestKey>
		<ns0:MeasureIndicators>
			<ns0:ImmediateEffect>NO</ns0:ImmediateEffect>
			<ns0:ImmediateEffectFlags>
				<ns0:Urgency>NO</ns0:Urgency>
				<ns0:TaxLevy>NO</ns0:TaxLevy>
				<ns0:Election>NO</ns0:Election>
				<ns0:UsualCurrentExpenses>NO</ns0:UsualCurrentExpenses>
				<ns0:BudgetBill>NO</ns0:BudgetBill>
				<ns0:Prop25TrailerBill>NO</ns0:Prop25TrailerBill>
			</ns0:ImmediateEffectFlags>
		</ns0:MeasureIndicators>
	</ns0:Description>
	<ns0:Bill id="bill">
		<ns0:Preamble>The people of the State of California do enact as follows:</ns0:Preamble>
		<ns0:BillSection id="id_32632628-A6E2-4195-89BE-27456F5D3263">
			<ns0:Num>SECTION 1.</ns0:Num>
			<ns0:ActionLine action="IS_ADDED" ns3:href="urn:caml:codes:HSC:caml#xpointer(%2Fcaml%3ALawDoc%2Fcaml%3ACode%2F%2Fcaml%3ALawSection%5Bcaml%3ANum%3D'1367.017'%5D)" ns3:label="fractionType: LAW_SECTION" ns3:type="locator">
				Section 1367.017 is added to the 
				<ns0:DocName>Health and Safety Code</ns0:DocName>
				, to read:
			</ns0:ActionLine>
			<ns0:Fragment>
				<ns0:LawSection id="id_4A5D48CF-8B9B-4270-9542-304370CE49FF">
					<ns0:Num>1367.017.</ns0:Num>
					<ns0:LawSectionVersion id="id_3726F10C-4508-4EEA-AA2E-4140D32E3910">
						<ns0:Content>
							<html:p>
								(a)
								<html:span class="EnSpace"/>
								Upon communication of a decision by a health care service plan delaying, denying, or modifying a health care service based in whole or in part on medical necessity, a provider may request a review by a peer physician or, if authorized pursuant to subdivision (d), a peer health care professional. The
						peer-to-peer review process shall meet both of the following requirements: 
							</html:p>
							<html:p>
								(1)
								<html:span class="EnSpace"/>
								Upon a request for peer-to-peer review pursuant to this section, a health care service plan shall directly and expeditiously connect the requesting health care provider with a peer physician or, if authorized pursuant to subdivision (d), a peer health care professional without requiring the requesting provider to communicate with any additional health care service plan employees or other individuals acting on behalf of the health care service plan. 
							</html:p>
							<html:p>
								(2)
								<html:span class="EnSpace"/>
								Notwithstanding
						any other law, a
						peer-to-peer review requested pursuant to this section shall occur within two business days of the request. However, if the enrollee faces an imminent and serious threat to their health as described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (h) of Section 1367.01, a peer-to-peer review requested pursuant to this section shall occur in a timely fashion appropriate for the nature of the enrollee’s condition, not to exceed 24 hours after the request.
							</html:p>
							<html:p>
								(b)
								<html:span class="EnSpace"/>
								If a health care service plan fails to meet the review timelines set forth in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a), the request for the health care service shall be deemed approved and supersede any prior delay, denial, or modification. 
							</html:p>
							<html:p>
								(c)
								<html:span class="EnSpace"/>
								A peer-to-peer review may be performed by a health care service plan’s contracted specialist reviewer, provided the reviewer is a peer physician or, if authorized pursuant to subdivision (d), a peer health care professional.
							</html:p>
							<html:p>
								(d)
								<html:span class="EnSpace"/>
								If a provider requesting peer-to-peer review pursuant to this section is not a physician,
						a peer health care professional may be the reviewer.
							</html:p>
							<html:p>
								(e)
								<html:span class="EnSpace"/>
								For purposes of this section, the following definitions apply:
							</html:p>
							<html:p>
								(1)
								<html:span class="EnSpace"/>
								“Peer health care professional” means a licensed health care professional who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and is of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider.
							</html:p>
							<html:p>
								(2)
								<html:span class="EnSpace"/>
								“Peer physician” means a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and
						is
						of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider.
							</html:p>
						</ns0:Content>
					</ns0:LawSectionVersion>
				</ns0:LawSection>
			</ns0:Fragment>
		</ns0:BillSection>
		<ns0:BillSection id="id_D4004410-4456-47FD-815B-D1A2724B2804">
			<ns0:Num>SEC. 2.</ns0:Num>
			<ns0:ActionLine action="IS_ADDED" ns3:href="urn:caml:codes:INS:caml#xpointer(%2Fcaml%3ALawDoc%2Fcaml%3ACode%2F%2Fcaml%3ALawSection%5Bcaml%3ANum%3D'10123.138'%5D)" ns3:label="fractionType: LAW_SECTION" ns3:type="locator">
				Section 10123.138 is added to the 
				<ns0:DocName>Insurance Code</ns0:DocName>
				, to read:
			</ns0:ActionLine>
			<ns0:Fragment>
				<ns0:LawSection id="id_AB643304-7E14-47BC-9CE9-87F50FDEA51A">
					<ns0:Num>10123.138.</ns0:Num>
					<ns0:LawSectionVersion id="id_685926DE-0FBD-42B5-9FCB-FC8F6038F308">
						<ns0:Content>
							<html:p>
								(a)
								<html:span class="EnSpace"/>
								Upon communication of a decision by a health insurer delaying, denying, or modifying a health care service based in whole or in part on medical necessity, a provider may request a review by a peer physician or, if authorized pursuant to subdivision (d), a peer health care professional. The
						peer-to-peer review process shall meet both of the following requirements:
							</html:p>
							<html:p>
								(1)
								<html:span class="EnSpace"/>
								Upon a request for peer-to-peer review pursuant to this section, a health insurer shall directly and expeditiously connect the requesting health care provider with a peer physician or, if authorized pursuant to subdivision (d), a peer health care professional without requiring the requesting provider to communicate with any additional health insurer employees or other individuals acting on behalf of the health insurer.
							</html:p>
							<html:p>
								(2)
								<html:span class="EnSpace"/>
								Notwithstanding any other law, a peer-to-peer review
						requested pursuant to this section shall occur within two business days of the request. However, if the insured faces an imminent and serious threat to their health as described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (h) of Section 10123.135, a peer-to-peer review requested pursuant to this section shall occur in a timely fashion appropriate for the nature of the insured’s condition, not to exceed 24 hours after the request.
							</html:p>
							<html:p>
								(b)
								<html:span class="EnSpace"/>
								If a health insurer fails to meet the review timelines set forth in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a), the request for the health care service shall be deemed approved and supersede any prior delay, denial, or modification.
							</html:p>
							<html:p>
								(c)
								<html:span class="EnSpace"/>
								A
						peer-to-peer review may be performed by a health insurer’s contracted specialist reviewer, provided the reviewer is a
						peer physician or, if authorized pursuant to subdivision (d), a peer health care professional.
							</html:p>
							<html:p>
								(d)
								<html:span class="EnSpace"/>
								If a provider requesting peer-to-peer review pursuant to this section is not a physician, a peer health care professional may be the reviewer.
							</html:p>
							<html:p>
								(e)
								<html:span class="EnSpace"/>
								For purposes of this section, the following definitions apply:
							</html:p>
							<html:p>
								(1)
								<html:span class="EnSpace"/>
								“Peer health care professional” means a licensed health care
						professional who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and is of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider.
							</html:p>
							<html:p>
								(2)
								<html:span class="EnSpace"/>
								“Peer physician” means a licensed physician who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and is of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider.
							</html:p>
						</ns0:Content>
					</ns0:LawSectionVersion>
				</ns0:LawSection>
			</ns0:Fragment>
		</ns0:BillSection>
		<ns0:BillSection id="id_CC868893-1ADD-4E9A-8CAF-5F65C13AE9CF">
			<ns0:Num>SEC. 3.</ns0:Num>
			<ns0:Content>
				<html:p>
					No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIII
					<html:span class="ThinSpace"/>
					B of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIII
					<html:span class="ThinSpace"/>
					B of the California Constitution.
				</html:p>
			</ns0:Content>
		</ns0:BillSection>
	</ns0:Bill>
</ns0:MeasureDoc>
Last Version Text Digest Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care, and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law provides for the regulation of disability insurers by the Department of Insurance. Existing law generally authorizes a health care service plan or disability insurer to use prior authorization and other utilization review or utilization management functions, under which a licensed physician or a licensed health care professional who is competent to evaluate specific clinical issues may approve, modify, delay, or deny requests for health care services based on medical necessity. This bill, upon communication of a decision by a health care service plan or health insurer delaying, denying, or modifying a health care service based in whole or in part on medical necessity, would authorize a provider to request review of the decision by a licensed physician, or a licensed health care professional under specified circumstances, who is competent to evaluate the specific clinical issues involved in the health care service being requested, and is of the same or similar specialty as the requesting provider. The bill would authorize a licensed health care professional to be the reviewer if the provider requesting peer-to-peer review is not a physician. The bill, notwithstanding any other law, would require these reviews to occur within 2 business days, or if an enrollee or insured faces an imminent and serious threat to their health, within a timely fashion appropriate for the nature of the enrollee’s or insured’s condition, as specified. If a health care service plan or health insurer fails to meet those timelines, the bill would deem the request for the health care service as approved and supersede any prior delay, denial, or modification.