Home - Bills - Bill - Authors - Dates - Locations - Analyses - Organizations
| Measure | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Authors |
Rogers
Coauthors: Connolly Zbur McGuire |
||||||||||||||||||
| Subject | State forests: forest management. | ||||||||||||||||||
| Relating To | relating to state forests. | ||||||||||||||||||
| Title | An act to amend Sections 4629.6, 4629.8, 4629.9, 4631, 4631.5, 4639, 4651, 4652, and 4656 of, and to add Section 4649.5 to, the Public Resources Code, relating to state forests. | ||||||||||||||||||
| Last Action Dt | 2026-03-25 | ||||||||||||||||||
| State | Amended Assembly | ||||||||||||||||||
| Status | In Committee Process | ||||||||||||||||||
| Flags |
|
||||||||||||||||||
| Leginfo Link | |||||||||||||||||||
| Bill Actions |
|
||||||||||||||||||
| Versions |
|
||||||||||||||||||
| Analyses | TBD | ||||||||||||||||||
| Latest Text | Bill Full Text | ||||||||||||||||||
| Latest Text Digest |
(1) This bill would redefine “management” for purposes of state forests as the handling of forest vegetation and soils within state forests for biodiversity conservation and wildfire resilience, while supporting durable onsite carbon storage and sequestration, climate mitigation and resiliency goals, equitable forest access, wildlife and fish habitat, recreation opportunities, and compatible research efforts. The bill would specify that timber harvesting consistent with this definition is permissible. (2) This bill would instead declare, among other things, that state forest lands, as provided, should be restored to fulfill ecological functions and processes, and managed consistent with the definition of management, and would further declare it to be the policy of the state to respect California Native American tribal sovereignty and to seek opportunities for comanagement and integration of indigenous traditional ecological knowledge in forest management. The bill would instead declare it to be the policy of the state, among other things, to accept or acquire lands, the reforestation or restoration of which is not assured under private ownership, to restore those lands with locally appropriate species and manage those lands for public benefit, and that the state should retain the existing land base of state forests primarily for research and demonstration purposes and allow the sale of timber and other forest products. (3) (4) This bill would, among other changes to the report, require the report include additional information including, among other things, any identified staffing needs, by department, and costs per position, to support a more efficient review of timber harvest plans. (5) Existing law creates the Timber Regulation and Forest Restoration Fund in the State Treasury and requires that specified revenues received from a lumber or engineered wood products assessment, less amounts deducted for refunds and reimbursements, be deposited in the Timber Regulation and Forest Restoration Fund and, upon appropriation by the Legislature, be used for specified purposes, including for forest resources improvement grants and projects administered by the department. This bill would instead require that all recreational user fees received by the department be deposited into the Timber Regulation and Forest Restoration Fund, as provided. The bill would instead also require that all revenue derived from the receipts from the sales of forest products, and any other funds generated by a demonstration state forest, be deposited in the Timber Regulation and Forest Restoration Fund, except as provided. The bill would require moneys deposited in the Timber Regulation and Forest Restoration Fund to, upon appropriation by the Legislature, be expended to support demonstration state forests, as provided. The bill would repeal the prohibition on the department regarding charging a fee that exceeds the amount necessary to reimburse the department’s costs for maintenance and improvement, as provided. (6) |