Home - Bills - Bill - Authors - Dates - Locations - Analyses - Organizations
| Measure | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Kalra | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Subject | Workers’ compensation: medical treatment. | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Relating To | relating to workers’ compensation. | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Title | An act to amend Section 132a of, and to add Section 4600.03 to, the Labor Code, relating to workers’ compensation. | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Last Action Dt | 2026-03-26 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| State | Amended Assembly | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Status | In Committee Process | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Flags |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Leginfo Link | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bill Actions |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Versions |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Analyses | TBD | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Latest Text | Bill Full Text | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Latest Text Digest |
Existing law establishes a workers’ compensation system, administered by the Administrative Director of the Division of Workers’ Compensation, to compensate an employee, as defined, for injuries that arise out of, and in the course of, employment. Existing law requires employers to provide medical, surgical, chiropractic, acupuncture, licensed clinical social worker, and hospital treatment reasonably required to cure or relieve the injured worker from the effects of the injury. Existing law makes it a misdemeanor for an employer to discharge, threaten to discharge, or discriminate against, or for an insurer to advise, direct, or threaten an insured to discharge, an employee because they have filed or made known their intention to file a claim for compensation, or an application for adjudication, or because the employee has received a rating, award, or settlement, as specified. This bill would require an employee, when possible, to make a reasonable effort to schedule treatment outside of work hours. The bill would require the employee, if the timing of the treatment is foreseeable, to provide notice if treatment occurs during work hours, as specified, and require the employer to provide this leave during work hours unless business necessity requires the treatment to occur at a different time or on a different day. The bill would require that the leave taken by an employee pursuant to these provisions run concurrently with leave taken pursuant to the federal Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 and the California Family Rights Act if the employee would have been eligible for that leave. If an employer denies an employee’s request to attend scheduled treatment, and the employer knows or should know that a business necessity does not require the treatment to occur at a different time or on a different day, the bill would make that denial a misdemeanor. The bill would also make it a misdemeanor for an employer to discharge, threaten to discharge, or discriminate against an employee because the employee requested or took leave pursuant to these provisions. The bill would make other conforming changes. |