Home - Bills - Bill - Authors - Dates - Locations - Analyses - Organizations
| Measure | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Authors | Ramos | ||||||||||||||||
| Subject | Indian children: guardianship or conservatorship proceedings. | ||||||||||||||||
| Relating To | relating to Indian children. | ||||||||||||||||
| Title | An act to amend Sections 1460, 1474, 1500.1, 1510, 1511, 1513, 1513.2, 1516.5, and 2250 of, to add Sections 1459.1, 1459.2, 1459.3, 1459.4, 1459.6, and 1459.7 to, to repeal Section 1460.2 of, and to repeal and add Sections 1449, 1459, 1459.5 to, the Probate Code, relating to Indian children. | ||||||||||||||||
| Last Action Dt | 2026-02-11 | ||||||||||||||||
| State | Introduced | ||||||||||||||||
| Status | Pending Referral | ||||||||||||||||
| Flags |
|
||||||||||||||||
| Leginfo Link | |||||||||||||||||
| Bill Actions |
|
||||||||||||||||
| Versions |
|
||||||||||||||||
| Analyses | TBD | ||||||||||||||||
| Latest Text | Bill Full Text | ||||||||||||||||
| Latest Text Digest |
(1) This bill would additionally state that the State of California is committed to protecting essential tribal relations by recognizing a tribe’s right to protect the health, safety, and welfare of its citizens. (2) This bill would define various terms consistent with provisions of the ICWA and for purposes of guardianship and conservator proceedings. The bill would also make conforming changes. This bill would require, if the subject of a petition is or may be an Indian child, that the petition include specified information, including the reasons to know or believe the child of the petition is or may be an Indian child and the efforts taken to prevent the need for the appointment of the guardian. The bill would specify that the court or a petitioner has a duty to inquire whether the child is or may be an Indian child when first filing a petitioner for guardianship or conservatorship. The bill would require a court presiding over any guardianship or conservatorship proceeding that could result in placement of an Indian child with someone other than a parent or Indian custodian, to inquire at the first hearing on a petition whether the child is, or may be, an Indian child, as specified. This bill would require the testimony of a qualified expert witness in a proceeding involving an Indian child in specified circumstances, including testimony that the continued custody of the child by the parent or Indian custodian is likely to result in serious emotional or physical damage to the child. This bill would specify notice requirements for proceedings involving Indian children, and set forth procedures for transfer of a case to jurisdiction of the child’s tribe. This bill, in a proceeding involving a child who would otherwise be an Indian child, but is not, based on the child’s Indian tribe not having federal recognition, would authorize the court to permit the tribe to participate in the proceeding upon request from the tribe. (3) This bill would require the court to appoint counsel for the parent or Indian custodian when it appears to the court that a parent or Indian custodian in an Indian child custody proceeding cannot afford to hire counsel and desires to have counsel for the proceedings. (4) This bill would additionally require a petitioner or proposed guardian to disclose an investigation by a county welfare agency regarding the safety of the child in a petition. |