Session:   
Updated:   2026-04-07

Home - Bills - Bill - Authors - Dates - Locations - Analyses - Organizations

Measure
Authors Rogers  
Coauthors: Bauer-Kahan   Connolly   Dixon   Kalra   Pacheco   Stefani   Zbur  
Subject Domestic violence: restraining orders.
Relating To relating to domestic violence.
Title An act to amend Sections 6300 and 6326 of the Family Code, relating to domestic violence.
Last Action Dt 2026-03-11
State Amended Assembly
Status In Floor Process
Flags
Vote Req Approp Fiscal Cmte Local Prog Subs Chgs Urgency Tax Levy Active?
Majority No No No None No No Y
i
Leginfo Link  
Bill Actions
2026-03-12     Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
2026-03-11     Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
2026-03-10     From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (March 10).
2026-02-17     Referred to Com. on JUD.
2026-01-30     From printer. May be heard in committee March 1.
2026-01-29     Read first time. To print.
Versions
Amended Assembly     2026-03-11
Introduced     2026-01-29
Analyses TBD
Latest Text Bill Full Text
Latest Text Digest

Existing law authorizes a court to issue an ex parte restraining order to prevent abuse based on reasonable proof of a past act or acts of abuse. Existing law authorizes the order to be issued solely on the affidavit or testimony of the person requesting the ex parte restraining order. Existing law requires the ex parte order to be issued or denied on the same day the application is submitted to the court, except as specified. Existing law prohibits an ex parte restraining order from being denied solely because the other party was not provided with notice.

This bill would instead prohibit a court from requiring that notice be provided to the party to be restrained in advance of filing an application for an ex parte restraining order. The bill would also prohibit a court from requiring an explanation or declaration to substantiate a party’s decision not to provide notice in advance of filing. The bill would prohibit a court from adopting or maintaining any rule, form, or practice that is inconsistent with these provisions.