Session:   

Bill

Home - Bills - Bill - Authors - Dates - Keywords - Tags - Locations

Measure AB 1523
Authors Committee on Judiciary  
Subject Court-ordered mediation.
Relating To relating to civil procedure.
Title An act to amend, repeal, and add Section 1775.5 of the Code of Civil Procedure, relating to civil procedure.
Last Action Dt 2025-10-01
State Chaptered
Status Chaptered
Active? Y
Vote Required Majority
Appropriation No
Fiscal Committee No
Local Program No
Substantive Changes None
Urgency No
Tax Levy No
Leginfo Link Bill
Actions
2025-10-01     Approved by the Governor.
2025-10-01     Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 201, Statutes of 2025.
2025-09-09     Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.
2025-09-03     Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 75. Noes 0. Page 2877.).
2025-09-02     In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
2025-09-02     Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 2397.).
2025-08-26     Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
2025-08-25     Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
2025-08-20     Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
2025-08-19     Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
2025-06-19     Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
2025-06-18     From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 17).
2025-05-28     Referred to Com. on JUD.
2025-05-20     In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
2025-05-19     Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 74. Noes 0. Page 1594.)
2025-05-07     Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
2025-05-06     From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (May 6).
2025-03-24     Referred to Com. on JUD.
2025-03-19     From printer. May be heard in committee April 18.
2025-03-18     Read first time. To print.
Keywords
Tags
Versions
Chaptered     2025-10-01
Enrolled     2025-09-05
Amended Senate     2025-08-25
Amended Senate     2025-08-19
Introduced     2025-03-18
Last Version Text
<?xml version="1.0" ?>
<ns0:MeasureDoc xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ns0="http://lc.ca.gov/legalservices/schemas/caml.1#" xmlns:ns3="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" version="1.0" xsi:schemaLocation="http://lc.ca.gov/legalservices/schemas/caml.1# xca.1.xsd">
	


	<ns0:Description>
		<ns0:Id>20250AB__152395CHP</ns0:Id>
		<ns0:VersionNum>95</ns0:VersionNum>
		<ns0:History>
			<ns0:Action>
				<ns0:ActionText>INTRODUCED</ns0:ActionText>
				<ns0:ActionDate>2025-03-18</ns0:ActionDate>
			</ns0:Action>
			<ns0:Action>
				<ns0:ActionText>AMENDED_SENATE</ns0:ActionText>
				<ns0:ActionDate>2025-08-19</ns0:ActionDate>
			</ns0:Action>
			<ns0:Action>
				<ns0:ActionText>AMENDED_SENATE</ns0:ActionText>
				<ns0:ActionDate>2025-08-25</ns0:ActionDate>
			</ns0:Action>
			<ns0:Action>
				<ns0:ActionText>PASSED_ASSEMBLY</ns0:ActionText>
				<ns0:ActionDate>2025-09-03</ns0:ActionDate>
			</ns0:Action>
			<ns0:Action>
				<ns0:ActionText>PASSED_SENATE</ns0:ActionText>
				<ns0:ActionDate>2025-09-02</ns0:ActionDate>
			</ns0:Action>
			<ns0:Action>
				<ns0:ActionText>ENROLLED</ns0:ActionText>
				<ns0:ActionDate>2025-09-05</ns0:ActionDate>
			</ns0:Action>
			<ns0:Action>
				<ns0:ActionText>CHAPTERED</ns0:ActionText>
				<ns0:ActionDate>2025-10-01</ns0:ActionDate>
			</ns0:Action>
			<ns0:Action>
				<ns0:ActionText>APPROVED</ns0:ActionText>
				<ns0:ActionDate>2025-10-01</ns0:ActionDate>
			</ns0:Action>
			<ns0:Action>
				<ns0:ActionText>FILED</ns0:ActionText>
				<ns0:ActionDate>2025-10-01</ns0:ActionDate>
			</ns0:Action>
		</ns0:History>
		<ns0:LegislativeInfo>
			<ns0:SessionYear>2025</ns0:SessionYear>
			<ns0:SessionNum>0</ns0:SessionNum>
			<ns0:MeasureType>AB</ns0:MeasureType>
			<ns0:MeasureNum>1523</ns0:MeasureNum>
			<ns0:MeasureState>CHP</ns0:MeasureState>
			<ns0:ChapterYear>2025</ns0:ChapterYear>
			<ns0:ChapterType>CHP</ns0:ChapterType>
			<ns0:ChapterSessionNum>0</ns0:ChapterSessionNum>
			<ns0:ChapterNum>201</ns0:ChapterNum>
		</ns0:LegislativeInfo>
		<ns0:AuthorText authorType="LEAD_AUTHOR">Introduced by Committee on Judiciary (Assembly Members Kalra (Chair), Dixon (Vice Chair), Bauer-Kahan, Bryan, Connolly, Harabedian, Pacheco, Papan, Stefani, and Zbur)</ns0:AuthorText>
		<ns0:Authors>
			<ns0:Committee>
				<ns0:Contribution>LEAD_AUTHOR</ns0:Contribution>
				<ns0:House>ASSEMBLY</ns0:House>
				<ns0:Name>Committee on Judiciary</ns0:Name>
				<ns0:Members>Assembly Members Kalra (Chair), Dixon (Vice Chair), Bauer-Kahan, Bryan, Connolly, Harabedian, Pacheco, Papan, Stefani, and Zbur</ns0:Members>
			</ns0:Committee>
		</ns0:Authors>
		<ns0:Title> An act to amend, repeal, and add Section 1775.5 of the Code of Civil Procedure, relating to civil procedure.</ns0:Title>
		<ns0:RelatingClause>civil procedure</ns0:RelatingClause>
		<ns0:GeneralSubject>
			<ns0:Subject>Court-ordered mediation.</ns0:Subject>
		</ns0:GeneralSubject>
		<ns0:DigestText>
			<html:p>Existing law prohibits a court from ordering a civil action into mediation when the amount in controversy exceeds $50,000, as specified.</html:p>
			<html:p>This bill would, as of January 1, 2027, increase the dollar amount of the above-described amount in controversy limitation to $75,000 and impose additional requirements, such as there being no ongoing discovery disputes and at least one party notifying the court of an interest in mediation, to be met before a court may order a civil action into mediation. If the parties do not stipulate to a mutually agreeable mediator, the bill would require the court to select a mediator, at no cost to the parties. Court-ordered
			 mediation would be required to conclude with a mutually acceptable statement of agreement or nonagreement, as specified.</html:p>
		</ns0:DigestText>
		<ns0:DigestKey>
			<ns0:VoteRequired>MAJORITY</ns0:VoteRequired>
			<ns0:Appropriation>NO</ns0:Appropriation>
			<ns0:FiscalCommittee>NO</ns0:FiscalCommittee>
			<ns0:LocalProgram>NO</ns0:LocalProgram>
		</ns0:DigestKey>
		<ns0:MeasureIndicators>
			<ns0:ImmediateEffect>NO</ns0:ImmediateEffect>
			<ns0:ImmediateEffectFlags>
				<ns0:Urgency>NO</ns0:Urgency>
				<ns0:TaxLevy>NO</ns0:TaxLevy>
				<ns0:Election>NO</ns0:Election>
				<ns0:UsualCurrentExpenses>NO</ns0:UsualCurrentExpenses>
				<ns0:BudgetBill>NO</ns0:BudgetBill>
				<ns0:Prop25TrailerBill>NO</ns0:Prop25TrailerBill>
			</ns0:ImmediateEffectFlags>
		</ns0:MeasureIndicators>
	</ns0:Description>
	<ns0:Bill id="bill">
		<ns0:Preamble>The people of the State of California do enact as follows:</ns0:Preamble>
		<ns0:BillSection id="id_3E3D5E38-BCF3-437F-963D-AB50BACEE125">
			<ns0:Num>SECTION 1.</ns0:Num>
			<ns0:ActionLine action="IS_AMENDED" ns3:href="urn:caml:codes:CCP:caml#xpointer(%2Fcaml%3ALawDoc%2Fcaml%3ACode%2Fcaml%3ALawHeading%5B%40type%3D'PART'%20and%20caml%3ANum%3D'3.'%5D%2Fcaml%3ALawHeading%5B%40type%3D'TITLE'%20and%20caml%3ANum%3D'11.6.'%5D%2Fcaml%3ALawSection%5Bcaml%3ANum%3D'1775.5.'%5D)" ns3:label="fractionType: LAW_SECTION" ns3:type="locator">
				Section 1775.5 of the 
				<ns0:DocName>Code of Civil Procedure</ns0:DocName>
				 is amended to read:
			</ns0:ActionLine>
			<ns0:Fragment>
				<ns0:LawSection id="id_70B9B425-E7F7-4814-89C4-DF56EEA93B3D">
					<ns0:Num>1775.5.</ns0:Num>
					<ns0:LawSectionVersion id="id_94F01DE3-6F3B-4AA4-BAC1-17E5DDEF6A58">
						<ns0:Content>
							<html:p>
								(a)
								<html:span class="EnSpace"/>
								The court shall not order a case into mediation where the amount in controversy exceeds fifty thousand dollars ($50,000). The determination of the amount in controversy shall be made in the same manner as provided in Section 1141.16 and, in making this determination, the court shall not consider the merits of questions of liability, defenses, or comparative negligence.
							</html:p>
							<html:p>
								(b)
								<html:span class="EnSpace"/>
								This section shall remain in effect until January 1, 2027, and as of that date is repealed.
							</html:p>
						</ns0:Content>
					</ns0:LawSectionVersion>
				</ns0:LawSection>
			</ns0:Fragment>
		</ns0:BillSection>
		<ns0:BillSection id="id_6882A2E8-48AA-4E19-A1A3-47A06FA6B09D">
			<ns0:Num>SEC. 2.</ns0:Num>
			<ns0:ActionLine action="IS_ADDED" ns3:href="urn:caml:codes:CCP:caml#xpointer(%2Fcaml%3ALawDoc%2Fcaml%3ACode%2Fcaml%3ALawHeading%5B%40type%3D'PART'%20and%20caml%3ANum%3D'3.'%5D%2Fcaml%3ALawHeading%5B%40type%3D'TITLE'%20and%20caml%3ANum%3D'11.6.'%5D%2Fcaml%3ALawSection%5Bcaml%3ANum%3D'1775.5.'%5D)" ns3:label="fractionType: LAW_SECTION" ns3:type="locator">
				Section 1775.5 is added to the 
				<ns0:DocName>Code of Civil Procedure</ns0:DocName>
				, to read:
			</ns0:ActionLine>
			<ns0:Fragment>
				<ns0:LawSection id="id_D8539298-3F05-474C-A719-B63B7CB4EE5E">
					<ns0:Num>1775.5.</ns0:Num>
					<ns0:LawSectionVersion id="id_089280AD-41D0-4E17-B1A9-D2353ABC6E81">
						<ns0:Content>
							<html:p>
								(a)
								<html:span class="EnSpace"/>
								The court shall not order a case into mediation unless all of the following conditions are met:
							</html:p>
							<html:p>
								(1)
								<html:span class="EnSpace"/>
								The amount in controversy does not exceed seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000). The determination of the amount in controversy shall be made in the same manner as provided in Section 1141.16 and, in making this determination, the court shall not consider the merits of questions of liability, defenses, or comparative negligence.
							</html:p>
							<html:p>
								(2)
								<html:span class="EnSpace"/>
								The case has been set for trial.
							</html:p>
							<html:p>
								(3)
								<html:span class="EnSpace"/>
								At least one party has notified the court of its interest in mediation.
							</html:p>
							<html:p>
								(4)
								<html:span class="EnSpace"/>
								There are no ongoing discovery disputes impacting the case.
							</html:p>
							<html:p>
								(5)
								<html:span class="EnSpace"/>
								The parties have been notified of their option to stipulate to a mutually agreeable mediator.
							</html:p>
							<html:p>
								(6)
								<html:span class="EnSpace"/>
								The parties have the ability to mediate through the use of remote technology upon the stipulation of all parties.
							</html:p>
							<html:p>
								(b)
								<html:span class="EnSpace"/>
								If the parties do not stipulate to a mutually agreeable mediator within 15 days of the date the case is submitted to mediation, the court shall select a mediator, at no cost to the parties, pursuant to standards adopted by the Judicial Council.
							</html:p>
							<html:p>
								(c)
								<html:span class="EnSpace"/>
								All parties and counsel attending the mediation shall comply with subdivision
						(a) of Rule 3.894 of the California Rules of Court, except that the parties may utilize any means of remote technology in accordance with the stipulation provided in paragraph (6) of subdivision (a).
							</html:p>
							<html:p>
								(d)
								<html:span class="EnSpace"/>
								Mediation ordered pursuant to subdivision (a) shall conclude in the form of a mutually acceptable agreement or statement of nonagreement, as described in Section 1775.9, no later than 120 days before the trial date described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a). Any mediation shall not delay the trial date described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (a).
							</html:p>
							<html:p>
								(e)
								<html:span class="EnSpace"/>
								The determination and any stipulation of the amount in controversy shall be without prejudice as to any finding on the value of the case.
							</html:p>
							<html:p>
								(f)
								<html:span class="EnSpace"/>
								This section shall become operative on January 1, 2027.
							</html:p>
						</ns0:Content>
					</ns0:LawSectionVersion>
				</ns0:LawSection>
			</ns0:Fragment>
		</ns0:BillSection>
	</ns0:Bill>
</ns0:MeasureDoc>
Last Version Text Digest Existing law prohibits a court from ordering a civil action into mediation when the amount in controversy exceeds $50,000, as specified. This bill would, as of January 1, 2027, increase the dollar amount of the above-described amount in controversy limitation to $75,000 and impose additional requirements, such as there being no ongoing discovery disputes and at least one party notifying the court of an interest in mediation, to be met before a court may order a civil action into mediation. If the parties do not stipulate to a mutually agreeable mediator, the bill would require the court to select a mediator, at no cost to the parties. Court-ordered mediation would be required to conclude with a mutually acceptable statement of agreement or nonagreement, as specified.