Session:   
Updated:   2026-02-04

Home - Bills - Bill - Authors - Dates - Locations - Analyses - Organizations

Measure
Authors Stefani  
Coauthors: Petrie-Norris   Blanca Rubio   Wicks   Ashby   Becker   Blakespear   Hurtado   Rubio   Wiener  
Subject Protective orders: Wyland’s Law.
Relating To relating to protective orders.
Title An act to add Section 6380.5 to the Family Code, relating to protective orders.
Last Action Dt 2025-10-10
State Chaptered
Status Chaptered
Flags
Vote Req Approp Fiscal Cmte Local Prog Subs Chgs Urgency Tax Levy Active?
Majority No No No None No No Y
i
Leginfo Link  
Bill Actions
2025-10-10     Approved by the Governor.
2025-10-10     Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 574, Statutes of 2025.
2025-09-24     Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.
2025-09-12     In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
2025-09-12     Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 80. Noes 0. Page 3420.).
2025-09-11     Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 2931.).
2025-09-09     Ordered to special consent calendar.
2025-09-02     Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
2025-08-29     From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 29).
2025-08-29     Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
2025-08-18     In committee: Referred to suspense file.
2025-07-15     From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (July 15). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
2025-07-10     Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
2025-07-09     From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (July 8).
2025-06-25     In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
2025-06-11     Referred to Coms. on JUD. and PUB. S.
2025-06-03     In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
2025-06-02     Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 1923.)
2025-05-27     Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
2025-05-23     Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
2025-05-23     From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (May 23).
2025-05-23     Assembly Rule 63 suspended. (Ayes 51. Noes 16. Page 1644.)
2025-05-14     In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
2025-04-24     Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
2025-04-23     Read second time and amended.
2025-04-22     From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (April 22).
2025-04-01     Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
2025-03-28     From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.
2025-03-28     Referred to Com. on JUD.
2025-02-24     Read first time.
2025-02-22     From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.
2025-02-21     Introduced. To print.
Versions
Chaptered     2025-10-10
Enrolled     2025-09-16
Amended Senate     2025-08-29
Amended Senate     2025-07-10
Amended Assembly     2025-05-23
Amended Assembly     2025-04-23
Amended Assembly     2025-03-28
Introduced     2025-02-21
Analyses TBD
Latest Text Bill Full Text
Latest Text Digest

Existing law requires each county to develop a procedure for electronically transmitting, upon the issuance of certain types of protective orders, the contents of the order and other specified information to the Department of Justice through the California Law Enforcement Telecommunications System. Existing law also requires the department to maintain a California Restraining and Protective Order System and to make specified information electronically available to court clerks and law enforcement personnel.

This bill, Wyland’s Law, would, subject to an appropriation by the Legislature, authorize the department to establish, or contract with a vendor to establish, an automated protected person information and notification system to provide a petitioner or a protected person in a protective order case with automated access to information about their case, as specified. The bill would require a record demonstrating whether the superior court has fulfilled its transmission obligations or a record demonstrating receipt of information about a protective order that the department maintains to be open to public inspection and copying.