Session:   
Updated:   2026-02-04

Home - Bills - Bill - Authors - Dates - Locations - Analyses - Organizations

Measure
Authors Pacheco  
Coauthors: Alanis   Nguyen   Michelle Rodriguez   Blanca Rubio  
Subject Peace officers: confidentiality of records.
Relating To relating to peace officers.
Title An act to amend Section 832.7 of the Penal Code, relating to peace officers.
Last Action Dt 2025-10-11
State Chaptered
Status Chaptered
Flags
Vote Req Approp Fiscal Cmte Local Prog Subs Chgs Urgency Tax Levy Active?
Majority No No No None No No Y
i
Leginfo Link  
Bill Actions
2025-10-11     Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 635, Statutes of 2025.
2025-10-11     Approved by the Governor.
2025-09-24     Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.
2025-09-13     Assembly Rule 63 suspended. (Page 3477.)
2025-09-13     Joint Rules 61(a)(14) and 51(a)(4) suspended. (Ayes 59. Noes 20. Page 3413.)
2025-09-13     In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
2025-09-13     Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 67. Noes 0. Page 3481.).
2025-09-12     Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 29. Noes 2. Page 3005.).
2025-09-10     Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
2025-09-09     Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
2025-09-09     Joint Rule 61(a)(13) suspended. (Ayes 28. Noes 8. Page 2568.)
2025-09-08     Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
2025-09-05     Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
2025-09-02     Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
2025-08-29     Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
2025-08-29     From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 29).
2025-06-30     In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
2025-06-18     In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
2025-06-11     Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
2025-06-10     From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 10).
2025-05-21     Referred to Coms. on PUB. S. and APPR.
2025-05-08     In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
2025-05-08     Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 60. Noes 2. Page 1483.)
2025-05-05     Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
2025-05-01     Withdrawn from committee.
2025-05-01     Ordered to second reading.
2025-04-29     Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
2025-04-28     Read second time and amended.
2025-04-24     From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 22).
2025-03-24     Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
2025-02-24     Read first time.
2025-02-22     From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.
2025-02-21     Introduced. To print.
Versions
Chaptered     2025-10-11
Enrolled     2025-09-16
Amended Senate     2025-09-09
Amended Senate     2025-09-05
Amended Senate     2025-08-29
Amended Senate     2025-06-11
Amended Assembly     2025-04-28
Introduced     2025-02-21
Analyses TBD
Latest Text Bill Full Text
Latest Text Digest

Existing law, the California Public Records Act, generally requires public records to be open for inspection by the public. Existing law provides numerous exceptions to this requirement. Under existing law, the personnel records of peace officers and custodial officers are confidential and not subject to public inspection. Existing law provides certain exemptions to this confidentiality, including the reports, investigations, and findings of certain incidents involving the use of force by a peace officer. Existing law authorizes an agency to redact the records disclosed for specified purposes including, among others, to remove personal data or information, as specified, and where there is a specific, articulable, and particularized reason to believe that disclosure of the record would pose a significant danger to the physical safety of the peace officer, custodial officer, or another person.

This bill would require a court in an action to compel disclosure pursuant to specified provisions, in determining whether there is a specific, articulable, and particularized reason to believe that disclosure of the record would pose a significant danger to the physical safety of a person, to consider whether a particular peace officer is currently operating undercover and their duties demand anonymity.

This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 832.7 of the Penal Code proposed by AB 847 and AB 1388, to be operative only if this bill and AB 847 or AB 1388 are enacted and this bill is enacted last.