Session:   
Updated:   2026-02-04

Home - Bills - Bill - Authors - Dates - Locations - Analyses - Organizations

Measure
Authors Kalra  
Coauthors: Garcia   Mark González   Ortega   Rogers   Schiavo  
Subject Evidentiary privileges: union agent-represented worker privilege.
Relating To relating to privilege.
Title An act to amend Sections 912 and 917 of, and to add Article 9.5 (commencing with Section 1048) to Chapter 4 of Division 8 of, the Evidence Code, relating to privilege.
Last Action Dt 2025-02-20
State Introduced
Status In Committee Process
Flags
Vote Req Approp Fiscal Cmte Local Prog Subs Chgs Urgency Tax Levy Active?
Majority No No No None No No Y
i
Leginfo Link  
Bill Actions
2025-08-29     In committee: Held under submission.
2025-07-14     In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
2025-07-02     From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 2.) (July 1). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
2025-06-11     Referred to Coms. on JUD. and APPR.
2025-05-13     In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
2025-05-12     Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 59. Noes 6. Page 1507.)
2025-04-09     Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
2025-04-08     Coauthors revised.
2025-04-08     From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 8).
2025-03-13     Referred to Com. on JUD.
2025-02-21     From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
2025-02-20     Read first time. To print.
Versions
Introduced     2025-02-20
Analyses TBD
Latest Text Bill Full Text
Latest Text Digest

Existing law governs the admissibility of evidence in court proceedings and generally provides a privilege as to communications made in the course of certain relations, including the attorney-client, physician-patient, and psychotherapist-patient relationship, as specified. Under existing law, the right of any person to claim those evidentiary privileges is waived with respect to a communication protected by the privilege if any holder of the privilege, without coercion, has disclosed a significant part of the communication or has consented to a disclosure.

This bill would establish a privilege between a union agent, as defined, and a represented employee or represented former employee to refuse to disclose any confidential communication between the employee or former employee and the union agent made while the union agent was acting in the union agent’s representative capacity, except as specified. The bill would permit a represented employee or represented former employee to prevent another person from disclosing a privileged communication, except as specified. The bill would further provide that this privilege may be waived in accordance with existing law and does not apply in criminal proceedings.