Home - Bills - Bill - Authors - Dates - Locations - Analyses - Organizations
| Measure | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Authors |
Kalra
Coauthors: Garcia Mark González Ortega Rogers Schiavo |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Subject | Evidentiary privileges: union agent-represented worker privilege. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Relating To | relating to privilege. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title | An act to amend Sections 912 and 917 of, and to add Article 9.5 (commencing with Section 1048) to Chapter 4 of Division 8 of, the Evidence Code, relating to privilege. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Last Action Dt | 2025-02-20 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| State | Introduced | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Status | In Committee Process | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Flags |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Leginfo Link | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bill Actions |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Versions |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Analyses | TBD | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Latest Text | Bill Full Text | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Latest Text Digest |
Existing law governs the admissibility of evidence in court proceedings and generally provides a privilege as to communications made in the course of certain relations, including the attorney-client, physician-patient, and psychotherapist-patient relationship, as specified. Under existing law, the right of any person to claim those evidentiary privileges is waived with respect to a communication protected by the privilege if any holder of the privilege, without coercion, has disclosed a significant part of the communication or has consented to a disclosure. This bill would establish a privilege between a union agent, as defined, and a represented employee or represented former employee to refuse to disclose any confidential communication between the employee or former employee and the union agent made while the union agent was acting in the union agent’s representative capacity, except as specified. The bill would permit a represented employee or represented former employee to prevent another person from disclosing a privileged communication, except as specified. The bill would further provide that this privilege may be waived in accordance with existing law and does not apply in criminal proceedings. |